Yesterday’s research on Ashburn townhomes and the high number of homes under contract got me poking deeper into the statistics. (It was a snow day, according to the school systems around here! I just enjoyed a day working from home! <smile>)

Here is what I found:

For Ashburn:

  • Townhomes, 210 active on the market, 75 under contract = 2.8 month absorption rate
  • Single family  homes, 240 active, 42 under contract = 5.71 month absorption rate
  • Condos, 50 active, 6 under contract = 8.33 month absorption rate

For Leesburg:

  • Townhomes, 239 active, 47 under contract = 5.09 month absorption rate
  • Single family homes, 444 active, 64 under contract = 6.94 month absorption rate
  • Condos, 124 active, 10 under contract= 12.4 month absorption rate

For Hamilton:

  • Townhomes, 1 active, no under contract
  • Single family homes, 54 active, 8 under contract = 6.75 month absorption rate

For Purcellville:

  • Townhomes, 18 active, 1 under contract = 18 month absorption rate
  • Single family homes, 148 active, 16 under contract = 9.25 month absorption rate

 For Round Hill:

  • Townhomes, 4 active, no under contract
  • Single family homes, 75 active, 7 under contract = 11.29 month absorption rate

What I read into this is that we are seeing a recovery in the Eastern part of the county that hasn’t spread to the West yet. (That is the usual progression of the ripple effect) Looks like things are improving. I’ll try to put out an update on this every week or two to see what kind of movement we see in the numbers.  I’m still feeling optimistic!

Cheers,

Heather

Related Posts with Thumbnails

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

No Responses to “Update: Homes Under Contract in Loudoun County”

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Loudoun County Market Update for Ashburn, Leesburg, Hamilton, Purcellville, and Round Hill « LoCo Real Estate Musings

Leave a Reply

You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>